The world governments will have to buy the debt of a large section of the world population with regard to home ownership, perhaps credit, and other core items which are bankrupting economies. The governments should not buy 100% but they can buy the differential between what the house is actually worth and the unsustainable value they paid less any funds/convertible assets they may hold. The basis of the decison as to how cuh should be the economic evaluation of the multiplier of what a house is worth in the average suburb. It is worth 5 - 9 times the annual average income. Thus a person who earns $50,000 should be able to buy a house valued at $250.000 to $450,000 maximum. One house, not two and not houses for investment. Those who bought for investment and not for living should not have their excess debt proportion paid. This is not a concept this is what the governments of the world will have to do. As for shares and other instrumenst they were all overpriced. They will not return to where they were and will be probably 50% of the values we have seen during the boom years. Since banks are not capable of lending the funds necessary to keep business going across the globe they are acting inwards. Governments wil have to draw upon superannuation funds creating new rules to allow funds to provide capital to firms. This will increase risk and so a premium will be charged, 0.25% to 0.50% by the funds, some form of government guarantee goes into place to protect peoples' superannuation and the mandated contribution levels to superannuation will have to increase to exoand the pool of funds. This can also help offset any bad debts in the system by giving super funds a wider capital base to earn from. (Kevin R Beck, Melbourne, Australia) |
![]()
Privacy Statement, Uses and Motivation |
|
IMPORTANT
every portal page uses scripting to update content.
So turn your active content on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking news |
|
|
| ENTER COUNTRY OR TOPIC AND CHOOSE LANGUAGE |

|
|
![]() ![]() |
| Link buttons provided by: |